Friday, 20 August 2021

WordJam's Top Ten 1970s Public Information Films

Still from Charley Says: Don't Talk to Strangers (1973)

If the Covid pandemic has taught us anything - you know, apart from western governments' obvious disdain for fundamental democratic concepts such as liberty and freedom - it's that no one knows how to make a half-decent public information film any more. True, guidelines have changed considerably since their glory days back in the 1970s, but if you're a fan of the genre you know that PIFs are nowhere near as memorable or effective if they don't scare the living shit out of you.

Case in point, take this recent example put out by the Scottish government last year:

 
© One Scotland

Not bad, I suppose (well, if you're the easily suggestible type, of course) - but where's the really horrific bit that burns itself onto your retina? Where's the bit that makes you wake up in a cold sweat when it comes crashing into your dreams? Or, to put it another way, where's the drama?                   

On this flimsy pretext, WordJam takes you back in time to an era when PIFs meant something. An era marked by rapidly changing social attitudes, economic instability and questionable fashion sense. An era when an evening's television or trip to the cinema could be punctured by a desperately earnest, hard-hitting piece about the evils waiting for you outside your front door, or in some cases in your own home.

In short, welcome to the strange yet beautiful world of 1970s public information films...

* * * * *

10.
Joe's Way
(d. Peter Hart, 1975)
Are you a twenty-something dreamer with pathologically poor time-keeping skills? Think running across the road without checking for oncoming traffic will get you to work sooner, or give your girlfriend less reason to complain about your tardiness on date night? Well, take a tip from poor Joe and learn some punctuality instead. At the very least, it's got to be easier than ending up with a shattered pelvis and legs resembling slinky toys.
 
Watch it here.
 
 9.
 Never Go with Strangers
(d. Sarah Erulkar, 1971)
 
That bloke in the dirty raincoat handing out sweets by the park swings may come across like a lovable eccentric, but have you considered what his true motives are? Perhaps he's a modern-day Fagin trying to put together a gang of pint-sized handkerchief thieves, or a mad scientist intent on harvesting children for their organs to build a monstrous henchman ready to do his evil bidding? Whatever his intentions, heed this film's advice and stay well away.

Watch it here.

8.
Play Safe
(d. David Eady, 1978)
Do kids still play with kites? I suppose they have Nintendo Entertainment Systems and compact discs of popular beat combos to keep them occupied now. Either way, I bet there are still plenty of pre-pubescent ninnies who think climbing up telegraph poles would be good for a laugh, in which case this film maintains at least some relevance. Having said that, I can't help wondering if the electrocution effects are just a bit too Top of the Pops to get the message across.
 
Watch it here.

7.
Robbie
(d. Ronald Dunkley, 1979)
 
Train enthusiast, aspiring footballer and impossibly annoying eight-year old Robbie Heywood gives in to peer pressure and trespasses on the railway line - with tragic consequences. Well, I say 'tragic': for someone who presents himself as a holier-than-thou, goody two-shoes he's surprisingly gullible and weak-minded. When the inevitable happens, you'll not only find yourself pontificating on the folly of hubris but also shouting "You twat, Robbie!" at the screen.

Watch it here.

6.
Building Sites Bite
(d. David Hughes, 1978)
I know, I know, this article isn't exactly up to my usual standards - but you try juggling a dull 9-5 job with a writing career and a blog, then, Mr Clever-Clogs, and see where it gets you. Eh? EH? I could've been one of the writers on the new series of Spitting Image, you know, if it wasn't for the producers scaling back on content that wasn't pro-Biden/Starmer. Anyway, here's a film about some creepy space kids watching their human contemporaries get mangled on building sites. Enjoy.
 
Watch it here.

5.
Searching
(d. John Krish, 1974)
 
Ever had one of those nightmares where you're wandering around an old, creepy building with nothing but a feeling of impending doom to keep you company? Just add a fire safety message to the mix and you get this exquisitely eerie 30-second masterpiece that made a million couples forego the traditional post-coital smoke and opt for a nice, safe cup of tea instead. 'Course, when I make love the sex is so good even the neighbours have a cigarette afterwards. Believe.

Watch it here.

4.
Apaches
(d. John Mackenzie, 1977)
 
A bunch of kids play Cowboys and Indians on a farm; cue scenes of mutilation, electrocution and poisoning that are a lot more entertaining than they should be. Apaches director John Mackenzie would later go on to direct the superlative television play Just a Boys' Game, described by none other than Martin Scorsese as "the Scottish Mean Streets", and the ground-breaking gangster film The Long Good Friday. Sadly, neither drama features someone being crushed by a runaway tractor.

Watch it here.

3.
Night Call
(d. Ferdinand Fairfax, 1977)
 
Barrie Ingham (AKA Alydon from Dr. Who and the Daleks, genre fans) plays an automobile journalist obsessed with a phantom car that keeps cutting him off on the motorway... or is it the other way round? You'll see the twist coming a mile away, but this low-budget sister film to Spielberg's Duel has such a hypnotic atmosphere and attention to period detail you won't really care. Plus it also features Pamela Salem in a revealing miniskirt. That's not very important, but y'know - I like Pamela Salem. And miniskirts.

Watch it here.

2.
Lonely Water
(d. Jeff Grant, 1973)
 
If Ingmar Bergman ever decided to make a PIF on the side, it would probably have ended up like this. Unlike other water safety PIFs of the era, Jeff Grant's film eschews humour and child-friendly messaging for metaphysical horror. "I am the Spirit of Dark and Lonely Water," intones a hooded figure voiced by Donald Pleasence, "ready to trap the unwary, the show-off, the fool..." For a whole generation of kids, this was their equivalent of "Are you ready for Freddy?" or "Hi, I'm Chucky! Wanna play?"

Watch it here.

1.
The Finishing Line
(d. John Krish, 1977)
 
Ever wondered what it would be like holding a children's sports day on an active railway line? Well, wonder no more as legendary PIF director John Krish takes us on a gut-churning, nightmarish journey that can only be described as Grange Hill meets Battle Royale. Who knows: if Robbie had seen this perhaps he wouldn't have climbed through that hole in the fence and gone on to win a trial for Manchester United instead of winding up in a wheelchair with only a lifetime subscription to Men Only to see him through.

Watch it here.

Wednesday, 18 August 2021

WordJam Message Board: Special Discussion

Today's Topic: Is the US right to pull out of Afghanistan?

JUstinBieberLover39888655592 - August 18, 18:15
I wish peeple wud leave simone biles a lone. shes jus lookin out for her men tal health. wats wrong with that

RussiaBot1917 - August 18, 18:16
Go back to sleep, dum-dum.

Biden2024 - August 18, 18:18
I think Biden's right to pull the troops out of Afghanistan. If anyone's to blame for the humanitarian crisis taking place there right now it's Trump.

MAGA1776 - August 18, 18:21
Sure, why not? It's not as if Sleepy Joe and the Dems have blamed him for anything else that's gone wrong on their watch, like the border crisis or inflation.

RussiaBot1917 - August 18, 18:23
If Reagan hadn't supported the Mujahideen in the Soviet-Afghan War there wouldn't even be a Taliban.

Biden2024 - August 18, 18:24
@RussiaBot1917: 100% this. Republicans have always been scum.

Biden2024 - August 18, 18:25
@MAGA1776: Give my regards to the wrong side of history, Trumptard.

RussiaBot1917 - August 18, 18:28
Then again, if Clinton hadn't sent them off to fight in Bosnia by making out Islam was under threat they wouldn't have been radicalised and attacked the World Trade Center.

MAGA1776 - August 18, 18:29
@RussiaBot1917: 100% THIS.

MAGA1776 - August 18, 18:30
@Biden2024: How's it looking on your side of history, Comrade Libtard?

BLM4EVA1865 - August 18, 18:43
So a bunch of white dudes go into a BIPOC community, brutalize everyone then leave without acknowledging the trauma they've caused? Hmmm... Isn't there a name for that? Oh yeah: WHITE FLIGHT. Calling it anything else is racist.

RainbowPrincess456 - August 18, 18:51
@BLM4EVA1865: Totally. This whole 'war on terror' has been informed by cis-het white male privilege right from the start. It makes me sad beyond words we're leaving Afghan womxn of all genders to fend for themselves. #Transafghanlivesmatter

KarenKilla - August 18, 18:58
America deserves to get it's ass kicked for acting like a whiny little bitch and invading Afghanistan for no reason at all.

MAGA1776 - August 18, 19:04
Erm... you people do know why we went in, right?

KarenKilla - August 18, 19:07
@MAGA1776: Yes, because Islamophobic fascists like you called the manager on some AFghan tourist's who just wanted to get a closer look at the WTC.

WhoWatchesTheWatchmen9/11 - August 18, 19:15
WAKE UP, people. The hijackers on those planes were just patsies for the REAL terrorists...

RussiaBot1917 - August 18, 19:16
Yeah, al-Qaeda.

WhoWatchesTheWatchmen9/11 - August 18, 19:16
No.

RussiaBot1917 - August 18, 19:18
Go on, then.

WhoWatchesTheWatchmen9/11 - August 18, 19:19
(((The Children Of The Circumcision)))

RussiaBot1917 - August 18, 19:20
That's what I said - Jihadists.

RainbowPrincess456 - August 18, 19:31
@RussiaBot1917: One of my besties (FYI, ALL my friends are best friends - including you guys!) was assigned female at birth by her Jewish parents, but now he's come out as genderfluid she may or may not choose to identify as circumcised when he feels male. The fact you immediately associate this particular characteristic with certain groups is deeply exclusionary and says a lot about your attitude to trans people. #Anyonecanhaveapenis

KarenKilla - August 18, 19:47
@RussiaBot1917: It wasn't Muslim's who attacked the Capitol.

RussiaBot1917 - August 18, 19:52
...And your point is-?

KarenKilla - August 18, 19:55
White supremacist's are the real terrorist's.

RussiaBot1917 - August 18, 19:59
Strange, I don't recall Bin Laden ever wearing a MAGA hat. But then, I don't live on Planet Asshole.

MAGA1776 - August 18, 20:12
@RussiaBot1917: LOL

BLM4EVA1865 - August 18, 20:21
@RussiaBot1917: He was wearing it internally. Read Robin DiAngelo and educate yourself, you racist fuck.

KarenKilla - August 18, 20:33
Fuckin A. I'm sick of these nazi douchebag's coming on here, sharing their dumbass opionion's and shutting people down with 'facts'. Who cares about 9/11 and Bin Laden, anyway? We've got worse thing's going on right now, like the BAME Holocaust at the hand's of racist cop's.

AllCopsMustFry - August 18, 20:34
George Floyd > 9/11.

BLM4EV1865 - August 18, 20:36
@AllCopsMustFry: THIS.

KarenKilla - August 18, 20:41
@AllCopsMustFry: We need to launch a Black op's mission against Derek Chauvin NOW.

JUstinBieberLover39888655592 - August 18, 22:09
We shud blow evry f-ing thing xcept Afganistan on the map off like Eminem sed. that will teech us fur bein rasists

Monday, 12 July 2021

How to Get Lucky at a Protest Rally

Some people engage in extreme sports, others enjoy starting fights or travelling to Covid hot-spots and licking lampposts, but for my money there can be no greater thrill-seeking activity than infiltrating protest rallies with the sole purpose of getting laid. You may call this cynical, manipulative or even irresponsible behaviour, but after living under virtual house arrest for nigh on eighteen months you've got to get your kicks where you can. And since to all intents and purposes nightclubs no longer exist and bars have become nothing more than adult creches, it's only natural that strapping young bucks like myself should turn our attention to other kinds of social gatherings in the pursuit of slap and tickle. Indeed, protest rallies are ideal for hook-ups. For one thing, you're surrounded by thousands of people at a time, which means the chances of scoring are far greater than your average Saturday night at the Dog and Trumpet. Then there's all that infectious, pent-up energy bubbling away amongst the demonstrators, and since energy can neither be created or destroyed but simply transformed from one state to another, why shouldn't it change from righteous anger to hot, steamy love action?

Now I imagine at this point you're probably saying, "Yeah, this all sounds very attractive, but aren't you leading us into a woke lion's den?" Well, I'm pleased I pretended you asked me that because if you follow the guidelines I've drawn up for you here there's absolutely no reason why even the most hard-right or resolutely non-ideological culture war veteran shouldn't find themselves dancing the pink starfish with a member of the self-styled progressive left.

The first rule for getting lucky at a protest rally is don't appear too flash. Aftershave, well-polished shoes and anything smarter than a jeans-tee shirt/hoodie combo is a dead giveaway for what you're really up to. You think that Extinction Rebellion protester in the two-piece suit who held up the tube at Canning Town station got his tummy banana sucked that night? No, you need to cultivate a chaotic, devil-may-care look that implies you threw on the first thing you saw when you got out of bed that morning. I'm not suggesting said clothing should be unwashed or you should forego wearing deodorant, but it doesn't hurt giving your natural body odours a chance to really let rip when you end up packed in the back of a police van on the way to the cells. It creates the illusion of hard, honest toil setting the world to rights - the ultimate aphrodisiac for that girl with the purple hair who insists on leading her fellow detainees in a chorus of "The Times They Are a-Changin'" while secretly wondering how pissed off daddy's going to be when he has to fork out for bail.

But, of course, dressing down doesn't mean you can't use props to draw attention to yourself. This is where logos and slogans come in, either emblazoned across your clothing or, better still, a placard. You should try to be inventive, though; it's no good attending an anti-Brexit rally with a sweatshirt or banner that reads 'NIGEL FARAGE IS A CUNT' as chances are at least another 200 people have turned up with their own crudely made variants on this Anglo-Saxon epithet. It's better to go for something witty like 'MY COUNTRY EXITED THE EU AND ALL I'VE GOT LEFT IS THIS CRUMMY SHIRT'. Introducing humour into the mix not only detracts from how dishonest or willfully misleading the statement is, it also makes for the perfect ice breaker. If you're having trouble coming up with your own slogan, I recommend checking out ones used by historical movements and altering them to fit today's cultural climate. If you're attending, say, a Black Lives Matter rally and you want something punchy that reflects the current state of race relations, why not take the anti-Civil Rights mantra 'RACE MIXING IS COMMUNISM' and change it to 'RACE MIXING IS COLONIALISM'? No one'll ever know you nicked it from some brain-dead Alabama Klansman. Besides, if it worked for Ibram X. Kendi it'll work for you. I've heard that guy's knee-deep in pussy. Then again, I've also heard people refer to Robin DiAngelo as an academic, so it's probably best to take that with a pinch of salt.

So, anyway, you're at the protest with your scuzzy clothes and provocative placard: what next?

Demeanor is everything. Playing it cool like you would in a bar or nightclub isn't going to work in this environment. It gives the impression you don't care enough, which is a massive turn-off to your average social justice warrior. Plus each protest group has its own set of codes and practices, so it's absolutely vital you familiarise yourself with them before trying your luck. If it's a climate crisis rally, you should be prepared to cry your fucking eyes out. We're not just talking getting misty-eyed here or summoning a lump in your throat, we're talking full-on emotional breakdown. You must whimper and wail like a soy-boy who's accidentally scolded himself with a vegan pumpkin spice latte. If you're having trouble in the waterworks department, try imagining everyone you love drowning in a lake of molten lava. If that just makes you giggle, however, you could always think about that scene in The NeverEnding Story when the horse dies. Conversely, if you're a white guy at a BLM or police brutality march any tears you shed will be dismissed as evidence of white fragility and you may be accused of appropriating black grief. In which case the best thing to do is keep your cool, but make sure you show the requisite dedication to the cause by aggressively shaming anyone who isn't taking part into raising their fist as a mark of solidarity. This generally works better with someone smaller than you or sitting quietly outside a restaurant or café with their family. No one wants to be tarred with the racism brush, least of all some shelf stacker on minimum wage who's been busting his hump all week to keep you in enough Fairtrade coffee to fuel those late-night Twitter rants.

Either way, by this point you'll have ingratiated yourself with your fellow protesters and had a chance to check out the talent. If you've caught someone's eye, don't assume you can just go up to them like Jack the Lad and trot out a variation of your usual patter. "Have you been protesting long?" is likely to be taken as a micro-aggression, invalidating their lived experience and suggesting they're a fraud, while asking straight-up if they want to go for a drink is the surest way to blow your cover. And if you're an arty type, you can forget serenading them with half-remembered quotes by activists or artisans from yesteryear; these days they're all either dismissed as 'dead white men' or, in the case of someone like Martin Luther King, naive fabulists who had no idea what they were talking about. Just to illustrate my point, I have a friend who managed to get up close and personal with a gorgeous, rainbow-haired vixen at the George Floyd demonstrations in Portland last year. Everything was going hunky dory until he let his guard slip and carelessly paraphrased that deeply embarrassing passage from On the Road where the Jack Kerouac character wanders the streets of Harlem wishing he was black. I won't bore you with the details, but one riot, millions of dollars worth of property damage and an emergency airlift from a police helicopter later, my friend's now willing to admit it was probably a mistake.

The trick is to find something polemical and direct, with just a touch of self-abasement to give the impression you care more about whatever cause it is you're supposed to be backing than you do for your own life or happiness. A solid, all-purpose opening line would be, "Don't you just hate [white people / systemic racism / fascism / capitalism / cops / climate change denialists / Brexit / Republicans / Tories / the AfD / the IDF / Islamophobes / Trump / Putin / Boris / Assad / Marine Le Pen / J. K. Rowling / anti-vaxxers / TERFs / homophobes / pro-life advocates / Christians / zoos / pet owners / meat-eaters / vegetarians / fatists / people who diet / Chick-Fil-A  / etc]? [It/They] fucking make[s] me sick." Practice saying this a few times in the mirror, altering the tone of your voice with each attempt until you find the appropriate emotional pitch. As mentioned earlier, this will vary depending on the movement you're associating with. Screaming it in someone's face is perfectly acceptable, as is saying it mournfully like you're willing death upon the entire human race, but never say it with even the hint of a smile. You're not down the Slug and Lettuce with a Stella in your hand trying to make the rack on that cute little number from Primark jiggle with every desperately laboured pun; you're meant to be saving the world, remember? Well, that and get your end away.

Now, as the conversation flows and you find yourself bombarded with terms like 'cis-het privilege', 'internalised whiteness', 'liberatory praxis' and so on, it's very tempting to let your eyes glaze over and just agree with whatever your potential shagee is saying. This is a mistake. As long as their adrenaline's pumping - and believe me, it will be - yours should be, too. It doesn't hurt throwing around a few trendy, pseudo-sociological buzzwords yourself, but the problem is they're much better versed in this kind of crap than you are and, given the opportunity, can spew it up for hours on end. A wrong move here will place you squarely in the 'ally zone', and that's not somewhere you really want to be. Ever. The answer? Go Extreme. A good example is using racial slurs to describe people of colour whose politics don't align with current protest movements. You should feel absolutely no guilt referring to public figures such as Tim Scott, Candace Owens, Kemi Badenoch, Calvin Robinson, Thomas Sowell, Inaya Folarin Iman, Coleman Hughes, Glenn Loury et al as "Uncle Toms", "House Negroes" or "Coconuts"; after all, if liberal media pundits and the Blue Ticks on Twitter can get away with it then why shouldn't you? It's not as if they're really black, anyway. (Okay, they look black, but then so did Al Jolson. Sort of.) The best thing about this approach is you can apply it in any number of mind-bendingly absurd and outrageous ways. Caitlyn Jenner? Transphobe. Germaine Greer? Misogynist. Bernie Sanders? Anti-Semitic. You see? It makes it look like you're so committed to social justice that you're willing to completely reshape reality. And for a green-haired maiden sporting a 'SMASH THE PATRIARCHY' tee shirt and an $800 pair of Adidas sneakers that's damn near irresistible.

If you follow this advice to the letter you'll be well on the way to making the sign of the two-headed aardvark in no time. But before you rush into anything, it's important to remain mindful of current year sexual etiquette. If you're a heterosexual male, NEVER take the lead when it comes to the initial kissing and fumbling stage. I really can't emphasise this enough. Any attempt on your part to initiate physical contact will be considered an act of assault and you'll suddenly find yourself about as popular as Bill Cosby at a beauty pageant. In this scenario, you must always ask permission. Ceding control of the situation increases the horn factor for them and allows you to keep your testicles. You could even try prefacing your requests with statements that assert your commitment to social justice. I usually go for something all-purpose like "I have nothing but the deepest respect for your gynecological autonomy, but would it be okay if I put my hand in your knickers?", however you may wish to come up with your own variants. (I'm told "Procreational sex is ecological fascism" is a pretty good opening salvo to use before asking a climate change protester for a blowjob.) But don't worry if this all sounds like a long, drawn-out slog: after a while your fellow squidgee will be so eager to get off she'll let you drop the beta-male act and grope to your heart's content.

Perhaps the most important consideration, though, is where to do the deed. Taking them back to your place is fraught with risk as it's not always possible to know how they'll react to the contents of your bookshelf, DVD collection, or even the pictures you have up on your wall. Just because you've taken the time to replace that poster of John Wayne with one of Nelson Mandela and hidden your well-thumbed copies of 12 Rules for Life, Irreversible Damage and The Madness of Crowds in the wardrobe alongside your League of Gentlemen and Russ Meyer box sets doesn't mean they won't find something triggering or problematic. That's just what they do; they can't help it. I mean, if To Kill a Mockingbird is now considered a white supremacist novel how do you think your conquest is getting to react when they see the DVD case for Conan the Barbarian on your coffee table? One minute you're tearing each other's clothes off, the next you're being denounced as an alt-right piece of shit. And don't think going back to theirs is going to be a safer bet, either. They may wish to put on some music that means something to them, which is a guaranteed way of dampening your ardour. I once copped off with an animal rights activist who insisted on playing Joy Division while we got down and dirty. Let me tell you, it's a job keeping your stroke up when you've got Ian Curtis bellowing "This is the way, step in-siiiide!" on every thrust. But even worse is what happens after you've made the beast with two backs. Unless you're the sort of bastard who makes a break for it the the second your erstwhile skin-buddy gets up to use the toilet, common courtesy dictates there has to be some form of pillow talk - and since these people only ever want to discuss their grievances or objections about society in general, you can expect more blather about 'racism-adjacency', 'structural inequality' and so on. You've suffered through this already, so why put yourself through it again now you've had your oats? It makes no sense, especially since you're just going to give them a fake number and a noncommittal promise to see them at the next Friends of Stalin general meeting.

No, the solution is a simple one. Do it outdoors - right there in the middle of the protest. As a concession to current public health sensibilities, wear a face mask; it'll make you feel like you're in an even kinkier version of Eyes Wide Shut. Other than that, shirts off, trousers down and get to work. Trust me, there's nothing more liberating than dipping your wick in front of thousands of strangers to the clatter of batons on riot shields and the hiss of tear gas. Even moronic chants like 'PIGS IN A BLANKET, FRY 'EM LIKE BACON' have a handy rhythm when you're horny enough. And who knows where it might lead? There you are in the middle of the street, bare arse rising and falling as the nubile cutie beneath you digs her nails in your back and squeals with delight; others may take your cue and join in. Just picture it: a mass of sweaty, scrofulous bodies of all shapes, hues and persuasions writhing in a sea of orgiastic delight. Now that's what I call a demonstration.

Friday, 4 June 2021

What You Didn't Miss: Anne Boleyn (Channel 5, 2021)


We open on a jousting match. Two combatants in full battle armour charge each other on horseback as the crowd roars in excitement. At the point of contact, one of the steeds suddenly raises itself onto its hind legs and throws off its rider. He crashes to the ground in a clatter of metal, causing great panic among spectators and squires alike. Watching this from the royal box is Anne Boleyn. She rises from her seat and holds a silk handkerchief to her mouth as a crew of armourers rush over to assist the fallen warrior.

ARMOURER #1: Art thou hurt, sire?

HENRY VIII: [raising his visor; angry] No nag road rashes me! Wet its neck, bruh.

A groom draws his sword and walks over to the horse, now being tethered to a post by stable hands. After a short struggle he cuts its throat. We focus on Anne's horror as geysers of blood jet from the wound and over the courtyard.

HENRY VIII: I ain't tekin' that shit from no one. Believe.

Close in on Anne's face as the King's words start to echo...

Cut to the royal bedchamber. Anne wakes from her sleep, rousing her husband as she raises herself upright and catches her breath.

HENRY VIII: [drowsy] You prangin' out or sum'ink?

ANNE: Apologies, my lord. I was... dreaming about the joust yesterday.

HENRY VIII: Oi mate, that was, like, well deep! Can you believe that nag dissin' me?

Anne gets out of bed and stares moodily out the window.

HENRY VIII: Ain't nuthin' to get gutted about. Steed had it comin', yeah?

ANNE: It's not that. But I fear, my lord, there are many in the ends who would wish to see your loyal wifey meet a similar fate...

HENRY VIII: Who?

The bedchamber doors open to reveal a privy servant and a very important guest.

SERVANT: [announces] Thomas Cromwell, first Earl of Essex.

HENRY VIII: Good Essex. Wag-one?

CROMWELL: My lord, I needs must talk to thee most pressingly on thy Jack Jones.

HENRY VIII: Why?

CROMWELL: [looks at Anne] 'Tis... a delicate matter, blud.

HENRY VIII: You givin' me batty boy chirps, bruh? In my yard?

CROWELL: Nah, blud! I-

Henry suddenly gets a text. He picks up his phone off the bedside table and opens his messages. The text appears onscreen à la Sherlock:

'FROM JANE SEYMOUR: WNT 2 GO RIDIN 2DAY... 😉'

HENRY VIII: I's chock today, man. Tek it up wiv Anne, yeah?

CROMWELL: But, sire-

HENRY VIII: Allow it.

He gets out of bed and crosses over to Anne.

HENRY VIII: Sorry, wifey. Stuff goin' down, init.

They kiss.

HENRY VIII: Know this, yeah? You's made my winter of discontent into bangin' summer.

ANNE: [smiles] Your majesty's sweet words envelope my soul like a pair of Christian Laboutin stilletoes on a Kardashian.

HENRY VIII: For real. Thou's well pengin'.

As he leaves the bedchamber he pauses to address Cromwell.

HENRY VIII: Laters.

As the door closes, Anne and Cromwell glare at each other in an uncomfortable silence. Finally-

ANNE: Come to poison the King's heart against me, Essex?

CROMWELL: [mockingly] Me, my lady-?

ANNE: It is well known that you bitterly disapprove of my proposals for the charitable redistribution of church wealth and an alliance with our dear French cuzz, King Francis.

Caption: 'THIS SPEECH WAS SOURCED FROM WIKIPEDIA'

CROMWELL: For shizzle. But thy beauty is slandered with a bastard shame far more egregious than thy damnable wokery.

ANNE: Then give a name to this perceived ignominy, or kindly stop chatting shit.

CROMWELL: [indignant] I know not whether thou art a gold digger, but thou ain't messing with an insolvent Tudor. Thy violent delights have violent ends, and soon, before God, righteousness shall make amends...

Pause, then-

ANNE: ...Is it 'cos I is black?

Don't forget to tune in for tomorrow's exciting, historically accurate episode, where Henry breaks a leg after falling off his e-scooter and Anne reports lute player Mark Smeaton to the HR department at Hampton Court for referring to himself as a minstrel - with horrifying consequences.

Thursday, 29 April 2021

In Memoriam: Michael Collins (1930-2021)

"Man has always gone where he has been able to go, it is a basic satisfaction of our inquisitive nature, and I think we all lose a little bit if we choose to turn our backs on further exploration. Exploration produces a mood in people, a widening of interest, stimulation of the thought process, and I hate to see it wither. Our universe should be explored by microscope and by telescope, but I don't believe the argument that less emphasis on one will cause a more powerful focus on the other. When man fails to push himself to the possible limits of his universe in a physical sense, I think it causes a mental slackening as well, and we are all the poorer for it. Space is the only physical frontier we have left, and I believe its continued exploration will produce real, if unpredictable, benefits to all of us who remain behind on this planet. That one cannot spell out in any detail what these benefits will be does not contradict or deny their existence."

                                                           - Michael Collins, Carrying the Fire (1974)

Friday, 19 March 2021

Be an Idiot

 

'Be More Alice!' the Guardian's culture section implores us today, explaining how literary characters from novels such as Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, Jane Eyre and Mrs Dalloway can (presumably retroactively at this point) help us navigate our way through lockdown.

Yeeeah, that's not a bad idea - but how many people will find the fortitude of Charlotte Brontë's heroine, who accepts an emotional void because previous experience has taught her the value of love? Or that of the eponymous character in Virginia Woolf's masterpiece, who resigns herself to a future she never imagined because the wisdom that comes with age has allowed her to cast off the expectations of youth and embrace new possibilities? And as for the little girl who followed a rabbit down a hole, we're already living in a world where we're expected to believe six impossible things before breakfast and words are constantly changing their meaning at the behest of whoever's using them at any given moment, so I'm not sure there's a great deal she can teach us, either.

Let's face it, in a world where most of us are under virtual house arrest, mental health is on the wane and the only people out protesting are more interested in tilting at windmills than addressing actual problems, the only literary characters any of us can associate with right now are Lady Deadlock in Dickens' Bleak House, staring out of the rain-streaked window of her country house and reflecting on the callousness of a society founded on stifling behavioural mores; Prince Myshkin in Dostoevsky's The Idiot, whose intellect and compassion are at odds with a world where neither of those virtues apply, isolating him in madness and despair; and, last but not least, the narrator of Proust's In Search of Lost Time, whose entire existence revolves around going to bed early and conjuring up remembrances of people and places from a past life that now exist purely in the extratemporal realm of memory. These may be tragic characters, but through them we can see parallels to our current physical circumstances and socio-cultural mindset. Unlike the Guardian's choices, which essentially encourage us to be good little girls and boys, Myshkin and co. get us to ask the sort of questions lockdown enthusiasts and people who refuse to read Dr. Seuss to their kids anymore would rather not hear.

'Course, I could be barking up the wrong trouser leg entirely, but it's something to think about next time you're stood at the checkout with a soggy cloth on your face.